|
|
Post by Cid on Mar 4, 2010 13:16:31 GMT -5
You get a raise if you do well, you get a pay cut if you're slacking off.
It makes sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cid on Mar 4, 2010 19:50:32 GMT -5
All right, so, if anyone named Zepp approaches asking/talking about things, don't give him any information.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malacai on Mar 5, 2010 9:18:45 GMT -5
Noticing gray being dead reminded me of Chan's getting a reward for planning so much while dead.
Shouldn't a dead person be less active, seeing how they're dead. They shouldn't have contact that could influence the game.
Or am I not making sense there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cid on Mar 5, 2010 17:01:46 GMT -5
Technically, though Chan's character is dead, that doesn't mean he can't still order people around. He hasn't respawned yet, but he'll have a new character with a higher rank in 7 days anyway.
And I'm not really sure where you saw that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malacai on Mar 8, 2010 9:29:13 GMT -5
Where I saw my idea, or chan getting a reward while dead?
|
|
|
|
Post by Cid on Mar 8, 2010 9:33:26 GMT -5
Chan's reward.
(Aside: LOOK AT PIRATE STATISTICS--LITTLE SPRITES).
|
|
|
|
Post by Malacai on Mar 9, 2010 8:03:52 GMT -5
From the Valentines day contest thread on the main forum
PLANNING CONTEST
I was going back and forth on this one. Nobody is really standing out amazingly right now, there are several good candidates. In the end I decided to give 2nd place to Feyd, who has really stepped up as an EF officer, and gotten EF actually using their officer forums ugh, and 1st place is going to Chan, because my god, he's spent like the last month dead and he hasn't gotten any less active.
2nd place - Feyd
1st place - Chan
|
|
|
|
Post by Cid on Mar 9, 2010 12:27:12 GMT -5
That was a contest...
|
|
|
|
Post by Malacai on Mar 9, 2010 21:45:49 GMT -5
so?
|
|
|
|
Post by Cid on Mar 9, 2010 23:12:38 GMT -5
Can we have some meaningful discussion now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malacai on Mar 10, 2010 18:49:11 GMT -5
That was meaningful discussion. It was something that didn't make any sense to me. Dead people should be unable to influence things, they're dead. But what sort of meaningful discussion would you like?
|
|
|
|
Post by Cid on Mar 10, 2010 21:38:04 GMT -5
Because it doesn't have ANYTHING to do with us, or have ANYTHING to do with ANYTHING I care about.
And I thought I sort of ANSWERED this a hundred times.
So discuss something ELSE now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malacai on Mar 12, 2010 9:47:23 GMT -5
you know if I discuss most anything outside of here I get in trouble.
But ok, what is our next course of action and can we spar before anything major happens?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ketara on Mar 12, 2010 14:29:41 GMT -5
Mal, dead people shouldn't be able to discuss things, but making it so dead people have no avenue to play is not fun.
Death should be a punishment, but you can't make it so harsh that people quit when they die.
|
|
|
|
Post by jacobin on Mar 12, 2010 19:03:40 GMT -5
Radcliffe is petulant.
|
|
