Post by Draco on Feb 16, 2010 14:17:03 GMT -5
For awhile now, we've been building up our forces for a strike against the fortress of Belfast. We've got Operation Odessa coming up soon with enemy NPC fleets to launch from Belfast AND Malta though. Last run, these fleets had enough fighter power to completely level Constantinople without any MS, tank, or ship support.
We have a unique opportunity to eliminate one of the staging grounds for Operation Odessa this week, but I want to hear what you guys have to saw on which target we attack on Friday. Here are a few pros and cons of each target. SS and SAF, feel free to give your opinions because we love you too.
We've got scouting reports on both of them (Ket said that you get plans for any base you owned that gets captured, so we've got a Malta report.) so that's not an issue.
Destroying either would also get rid of a NPC fleet for Odessa so that's not an issue either.
Belfast
Pros: Europe would become Zeon territory
Cons: It is the more heavily-defended of the Fed bases in the region.
Malta
Pros: We'd have a better chance of destroying it with its lighter defenses
Cons: Europe would remain contested
We have a unique opportunity to eliminate one of the staging grounds for Operation Odessa this week, but I want to hear what you guys have to saw on which target we attack on Friday. Here are a few pros and cons of each target. SS and SAF, feel free to give your opinions because we love you too.
We've got scouting reports on both of them (Ket said that you get plans for any base you owned that gets captured, so we've got a Malta report.) so that's not an issue.
Destroying either would also get rid of a NPC fleet for Odessa so that's not an issue either.
Belfast
Pros: Europe would become Zeon territory
Cons: It is the more heavily-defended of the Fed bases in the region.
Malta
Pros: We'd have a better chance of destroying it with its lighter defenses
Cons: Europe would remain contested
